这个CR的答案好像和题没什么关系！－－还有其他大侠提提意见吗？

zyh79

Pamela中的第一句好像漏了点什么。
这题从最简单的角度看，
P说要加强训练，Q说没必要，P反驳说病人病情加重了，非加强不可。

samgxs

谢谢zyh79
还有其他大侠提提意见吗？

samgxs

Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals, they work such long hours-- up to 36 consecutive hours—that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.
Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?

Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy’s arguments?

Answer: because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stays than in the past

My answer: the load of work on resident physicians in training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.

[此贴子已经被作者于2002-11-13 21:00:18编辑过]

tongxun

我的意见： 两个选项都不对。相比较来讲，你的较好。
会不会串题了？还有其他的选项吗？

samgxs

我对了好几次答案，是没有串题，但是可以怀疑是印刷本来就有问题！这是不是驳斥A？

redhat

小小意见，请多指正:
the ans. should somewhat weaken Quincy’s argument.
in ans. (b) more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
which  makes the most effective counter against Quincy’s “Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?”

samgxs

现在看答案好像有点点感觉了，好像是正确答案说条件改变了medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals，所以病人病的时间长了，来驳斥。