一道JJ讨论

lala

结婚的年轻人比不结婚的年轻人活的长，并不因为是结婚导致长寿，是由于结婚的人有更少的不良嗜好，例如抽烟，酗酒。support
A 同样有不良嗜好，结了婚的人更容易戒除。
B Single people who have health lifestyles can live as long as married people who also have health lifestyles. (Open to discussion.)

欢迎讨论
[em27]

yiyuan05

我认为是A。

tongxun

A：支持
B：削弱

cook

What's the conclusion? If the deduction  is as followed:
conclusion: 结婚的年轻人比不结婚的年轻人活的长
premise:并不因为是结婚导致长寿，是由于结婚的人有更少的不良嗜好，例如抽烟，酗酒

there exist the assumption: 有更少的不良嗜好人活的长.
So, I perfer B as the support is consistent with assumption.
A. repeats the premise , please see: 同样有不良嗜好，结了婚的人更容易戒除 Vs."结婚的人有更少的不良嗜好"

redli

原来刚看到A时，我几乎毫不犹豫就选它，但看到B时间又很犹豫，B相当于一个必要条件，应该说，是个ASSUMPTION更合适些。
刚才COOK说A重复了前提，但这也是GMAT支持题中的一种答法。
还是很想大家的意见。

lala

ARE U SURE,yiyuan05?
Actually, i think A is right. But i'm not sure.
i think "结婚的年轻人比不结婚的年轻人活的长" 是一个现象而不是文章结论

cook

To redli: Support assumption is better than repect the information.
***************************************************
To lala: i think "结婚的年轻人比不结婚的年轻人活的长" 是一个现象而不是文章结论
Then , what is the conclusion? 有更少的不良嗜好人活的长 .then B is the answer to support.