Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.
2. The author’s method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to
(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim
(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs
(C) point out that the opponents’ claims imply a dilemma
(D) show that the opponents’ reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion（B）
(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget
与反对者的指控相反的是，新的法律的条款被修正了。反对者应记得new deal将国家从大的经济危机中拯救出来，虽然一些条款后来被认为是违宪。
问作者攻击反对者指控的方法是什么？
C为什么不对，虽然这个法律不好，可是它的indiscriminate cuts 是对的，有点类似于new deal 的dilemma. | 
