再请教lsat16-1－11

chexplorina

11. Should a Journalist's story begin with the set phrase "In a surprise development" as routinely happens? Well, not if the surprise was merely the journalist' s, since journalists should not intrude themselves into their stories, and not if the surprise was someone else's, because if some person's surprise was worth mentioning at all, it should have been specifically attributed. The one possibility remaining is that lots of people were surprised: in that case, however, there is no point in belaboring the obvious.
Which one of the following most accurately states the conclusion of the argument above?
(A) Journalists should reserve use of the phrase "In a surprise development" for major developments that are truly unexpected.
(B) The phrase "in a surprise development" is appropriately used only where someone's being surprised is itself interesting.
(C) The phase "in a surprise development" is used in three distinct sorts of circumstances.
(D) Journalists should make the point that a development comes as a surprise when summing up, not when introducing a story.
(E) Introducing stories with the phrase "in a surprise development" is not good journalistic practice.
题干中若干not if 和since, because之类，弄得我晕头转向，不知所云，请大侠指点！

回家过年

这题估计谁都得晕.
no point不知是指什么.可能no purpose
e 吧E是全盘否定了题目的所有说法！认为都不对啊！
c 也不错,保险
ce没跑了,不过两个我都喜欢
请高人指点

justag

I think E is the best if you read the paragraph carefully. Ask yourself what's the author's purpose? "NOT IF", right? The phrase "surprise" should not be used under the three circumstances which are actually all the circumstances an journalist can encounter. So, E.

Other comments?