返回列表 发帖

help!~~~another question from feifei80. thanks!

89. Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of bean plants or other legumes produce fixed nitrogen, which is one of the essential plant nutrients and which for non-legume crops, such as wheat, normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer. So if biotechnology succeeds in producing wheat strains whose roots will play host to Rhizobium bacteria, the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.
The argument above makes which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Biotechnology should be directed toward producing plants that do not require artificial fertilize.
(B) Fixed nitrogen is currently the only soil nutrient that must be supplied by artificial fertilizer for growing wheat crops.
(C) There are no naturally occurring strains of wheat or other grasses that have Rhizobium bacteria living in their roots.
(D) Legumes are currently the only corps that produce their own supply of fixed nitrogen.
(E) Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would produce fixed nitrogen.

the answer is E. but how do you guys eliminate B, since the difference betweeh the two terms "nitrogen-based fertilizer" and "artificial fertilizer" can't be ignored yah Thanks!

BTW: It's painful that I can't eliminate the fake choice from the two choices that are left. I often choose the wrong one of the two (( Are there any tips for me to utilize under this situation? Thanks a lot!
收藏 分享

咋的?

我先表个态:
根瘤菌能固氮给豆科,非豆科无固氮菌生活需要氮肥,如果生物技术(我荒废的专业)能够培育出能作为宿主的非固氮植物(麦子), 那么氮肥使用就少了.
E]直接说方法可行或有意义,
B很明显,说生物固氮是唯一的养分(化肥提供给麦子的),直接想有点迷糊,取非生物固氮虽然不是唯一的养分,但是氮肥还能减少,不能削弱结论.
如果削弱只剩两个,取非是个好办法(狒狒说的),我也觉得不错,
其实(个人认为),逻辑除了削弱,假设,加强,方法比较重要,其他能看动就能作对.这三个里也就是他因,取非,无因无果等几个方法对付难题,详情看看陈响动的逻辑和狒狒的课堂录音前几段就行了.
[em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11]

TOP

thanks! still need some training here, hehe~~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看