请教狒狒逻辑——第90题

modernre

没找到讨论，只好贴出来了

90. Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rules.

Which of the following is a principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?

(A) Government intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed.

(B) The right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion.

(C) The right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual.

(D) It is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace.

(E) Where the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise.

本题没太看明白，哪位牛牛给解释一下题义和选项。
thanks in advance

shiningsmile

谢谢

reginechen

……omg。。。我一直以为这个businesses是商业的意思………

modernre

多谢了。偶从这个题上最大的收获就是还是要从全局上把握题意，尤其是逻辑和阅读，现在语法似乎也有这个趋势。其实有些题并不是很难，如果题意把握正确了，就像中国老话说的“听话听音”，答案基本也就差不太多了。

Gabby308

我写错了，应该是私人自己决定法规和权利

这个权利被政府粗暴的干涉了

sorry

是一个of 套 of的结构

modernre

感谢。但偶还有个小问题，题干中最后的那个their你说是指代government，但“政府”是单数的，这里有什么问题吗？

Gabby308

90. Current legislation 【that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers （on the premises of privately owned businesses）】is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact 【that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes】 is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rules.

现行的法律(要求将区域进行区分，对于吸烟和不吸烟的人指派不同的区域，基于的前提是这些私人的事件)是对私人区域的一种侵犯，这种侵犯是不正当的。（总的概括起来说就是法律牵扯了个人的私事，是不好的）。事实上【研究表明不吸烟的人会因为吸入香烟的烟雾而harmed】这一条其实不是主要的问题。而，主要的问题是政府干涉了私人事件来决定政府的政策和法规。

Which of the following is a principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?

下列哪个原则，如果被接受，可以使得上述结论顺利得出

(A) Government intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed.

(B) The right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion.

(C) The right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual.

(D) It is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace.

(E) Where the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise.

本题没太看明白，哪位牛牛给解释一下题义和选项。
结论是政府干涉了私人的事件来确定政府自己的政策和法规，这一点是非常不好的。只要说政府干涉私人事件是不好的就好了。私人的事情不要政府来管。
A：已经说了那个个研究不是主要问题，因此when后面的东西就不是原因了
B：说反了，同A
C：答案。说自己私事自己解决的权利高于政府的权利和责任
D：无关
E：私欲和公德冲突时，主要原因就会有妥协。－－－－个人权利高于一切，不容妥协。