返回列表 发帖

[讨论]OG11-91

91.    Businesses are suffering bacause of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce taxpayers to put a larger portion of their incomes into retirements savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for business?

A.    When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly.

C.    Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.

OG答案为A,理由是由于多出的退休金需要同时面对随之而来的消费者贷款的需求,而不能单一地满足商业贷款需求,由此计划的有效性下降。
C错的原因是因为只是SOME people,而不是most people没有增加退休金的存款,所以不会影响计划的有效性。

请问:是否some所表示的数量真的非常非常少吗?即使非常非常少,但必然也会对计划的有效性产生影响。而A中产生的消费者贷款的需求的程度也未提及,所以无法判断它对有效性影响的程度。那么这时如何判断A比C more SERIOUS呢

题中用了induce(to persuade someone to do something, especially something that does not seem wise),有这层含义在,表示some people完全有理由拒绝增加退休金存款,直接打击了计划的有效性啊。

收藏 分享

这个其实我一上来也迷糊了,不过看过你的分析之后明白了一点,大致是这样Some是不多不少,是起到weaken的作用了,但是有没有serious weaken,就和其他比较再看A,consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly.如果是always的情况,就相当于绝大多数都增加了,而且corressponding也决定了数量是成比例的增加A选项看上去比C的一个some力度大不少,因此应该选A

欢迎讨论

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看