返回列表 发帖

LSAT: TEST SIX__SECTION II__2

Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence linking a number of structural disorders to jogging. Among the ailments seemingly connected with this now-popular sport are spinal disk displacements, stress fractures of the feet and ankles, and tenfonitis. Furthermore, these injuries do not occur exclusively among beginning runners-veteran joggers suffer an equal percentage of injuries. What the accumulating data suggest is that the human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses of jogging.

Which one of the following is an assumption of the argument?

(A) The link between jogging and certain structual disorders appears to be a causal one.
----------------
A. Why?
收藏 分享

提干的推理是:无数病例推出human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses of jogging。
A选项取非慢跑和structual disorders无因果关系显然推翻了提干的论据,达到了weaken的效果。
中华国内一亡命徒!

TOP

补充一下:本题用排除法做也比较清楚

(B) Jogging causes more serious disorders than other sports.

(C) The jogger's level of experience is a factor determining the likelihood of a jogging injury.

(D) Some sports are safer for the human body than jogging.

(E) The human species is not very durable.

B,D,E都是文中没有提到的概念,显然排除。(tips:逻辑题中提干没有出现比较,选项中出现一般为错误答案) C显然是和提干对着干,更不可能是assumption。
中华国内一亡命徒!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看