- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 288
- 经验
- 288 点
- 威望
- 0 点
- 金钱
- 612 ¥
- 魅力
- 303
|
to fernandochang:
where are your logic questions come from? some of these are not the ones that I have seen in Yellow books.
As to the first ques, I suspect you have typed wrong the arguement, would you pls check it out ? The answer to this question , I think, is A.
19 qu, the key to this question is that why the arguement makes the conclusion that the Constitution is a fallible and incomplete guide to national policymaking. To draw this , the arguement argues that Instead of 3 branches of government---legislative, executive, and judicial---, there may be many possibilities of constructions of branches of government dealing with any particular subject matter, like 5,7,20,1. But the arguement is accompanied by a vague use of a phrase" branches of governments " , because one meaning of the phrase is described in the Constitution, and the second meaning of the same phrase is put forward by the author himself .
20 ques, if the fiction is able to provide insight into the reality , the conclusion is certainly be weakened. The other answer choices couldn't influence the conclusion oppositive.
21 ques, ask for assumption. Why the greatest chance for the existence of extraterrestrial life is on a planet beyond our solar system ? Could any extraterrestrial life live on a planet unlike our solar system ? if this possibility sounds, how it is the greatest chance that the extraterrestrial life would live on a planet like ours? Clearly, the assumption would be the one that asserts that the extraterrestrial life would require similar envirnment conditions like those of our solar system and the Earth we are living on.
22 and 23 is the same question, I explain 22 and you could think 23 over by yourself . The argument tells that if the dormitory room is above 2 story, it would have a fire escape .
(A)2nd floor dormitory rooms do not have fire escapes.
the argument only tells that if the room is above 2, it would have a fire escape.but doesn't tells that if the room is on 2 , it would haven't any fire escape. Thus it couldn't be certainly for us to conclude that A must be true.
(B)3rd floor dormitory rooms do not have fire escapes.
B is definitively wrong . Could you see?
(C)Only dormitory rooms above the 2nd floor have fire scapes.
the same as A .
(D)4th dormitory rooms have fire escapes.
the same as A
E)Some 2-story dormitories do not have fire escapes.
the same as A
24 ques, " because of the fundamental questions that each poses. Historians are ultimately interested in why change occurred, whereas anthropologists are concerned with the meaning of actions and systems. ". look at the passage , especially the key words : fundamental , whereas, . what is the main difference between historian research and anthropological research ? Clearly as the argument tells, " because of the fundamental questions that each poses " and " ......whereas......" , now , could you sense out the puzzle ? Yes! you get it , that is , the former is mainly different from the latter in some fields , if the answer is to be a good one , it would have to mention somthing like what you sense out as above. Compare the five choices with your sensation, (A)The meaning of actions and systems do not fully explain why change occurred.
32 ques, ask for the most support. pls look into the question.
33 ques, " that we are rid of this type of aesthetics. " , it's easy to find out the answer.
打字好累啊, 斑竹真不好作, 有没有大侠来给助助场啊,
to believe, to achieve |
|