返回列表 发帖

一道LSAT难题 Set1 II-17

if the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? to dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
17. which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(a) the arts of life have no useful end.
(b) the artificial is not better than the natural.
(c) digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(d) the injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(e) the arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

这道题我怎么也搞不清楚题干要说什么,conclusion是什么,帮帮忙吧
收藏 分享

采用了反问的方式。
结论:artificial is better than the natural
论据:to dig,to plow, to build, to wear clothes —all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature。
潜台词(即假设)是:这些东西都比NATURE 好,否则就是all the arts of life are to what end!   IF NOT, WEAKEN THE CONCLUSION

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看