返回列表 发帖

补充教材P177 60

补充教材P177 60
  The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment. “When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
  ---Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A)        The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B)        The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C)        If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D)        The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E)        If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.
能帮我分析一下这道题吗?conclusion 和evidence各是什么?答案为何是E?
收藏 分享

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看