返回列表 发帖

OG12 117

After evidence was obtained in the 1920s that
the universe is expanding, it became reasonable
to ask: Will the universe continue to expand
indefinitely, or is there enough mass in it for the
mutual attraction of its constituents to bring this
expansion to a halt? It can be calculated that
the critical density of matter needed to brake the
expansion and “close” the universe is equivalent
to three hydrogen atoms per cubic meter. But the
density of the observable universe—luminous matter
in the form of galaxies—comes to only a fraction
of this. If the expansion of the universe is to stop,
there must be enough invisible matter in the
universe to exceed the luminous matter in density
by a factor of roughly 70.
Our contribution to the search for this “missing
matter” has been to study the rotational velocity
of galaxies at various distances from their center
of rotation. It has been known for some time that
outside the bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy
luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the
center. If luminosity were a true indicator of mass,
most of the mass would be concentrated toward
the center. Outside the nucleus the rotational
velocity would decrease geometrically with distance
from the center, in conformity with Kepler’s law.
Instead we have found that the rotational velocity
in spiral galaxies either remains constant with
increasing distance from the center or increases
slightly. This unexpected result indicates that the
falloff in luminous mass with distance from the
center is balanced by an increase in nonluminous
mass.
Our findings suggest that as much as 90
percent of the mass of the universe is not radiating
at any wavelength with enough intensity to be
detected on the Earth. Such dark matter could be
in the form of extremely dim stars of low mass,
of large planets like Jupiter, or of black holes,
either small or massive. While it has not yet been
determined whether this mass is sufficient to
close the universe, some physicists consider it
significant that estimates are converging on the
critical value.

117. The authors’ suggestion that “as much as 90 percent
of the mass of the universe is not radiating at any
wavelength with enough intensity to be detected on
the Earth” (lines 34–37) would be most weakened if
which of the following were discovered to be true?
(A) Spiral galaxies are less common than types of
galaxies that contain little nonluminous matter.
(B) Luminous and nonluminous matter are
composed of the same basic elements.
(C) The bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy also
contains some nonluminous matter.
(D) The density of the observable universe is
greater than most previous estimates have
suggested.
(E) Some galaxies do not rotate or rotate too slowly
for their rotational velocity to be measured
此题看不懂啊,哪位NN给解释下??
收藏 分享

你哪里看不明白~
题目说的是百分之九十宇宙中的物质是以任何波长具有足够的强度,能在地球上被发现的~
上一段说的是有螺旋的星系推出的结论,螺旋星系具有代表性质,我认为选着a
特殊削弱,只有说明螺旋星系不具有普遍性就好了呀~

TOP

我还是不太明白。。上一段哪说螺旋星系有代表性质了呀?一直在说什么中心的距离增加减少什么的,看得我都晕了。。还说 不发光体平衡了 发光体和中心的距离的falloff。。。什么跟什么啊

TOP

这里的our finding很明显指的是针对spiral galaxy的研究成果,因为之前段落"we"研究的只是spiral galaxy,而他们试图把这个星系的规律应用到整个宇宙。所以前提是spiral galaxy的组成结构具备代表性才行。A可以很好的削弱这个前提。

“一直在说什么中心的距离增加减少什么的”这描述的是spiral galaxy的具体特性。做这道题rainbow你没看懂细节也没关系的,关键是看到那个转承关系。

TOP

天啊 这篇我觉得超级难啊,不看懂细节只看转承关系 这种很纠结的细节题可以做对吗?

TOP

原來spiral galaxies是galaxies的一種阿,看懂了,這篇跟那篇有關于水的法律文章,是我覺得最難的文章.邏輯不明顯,不好找,考試上碰到這2篇,也只能放弃,考猜了

TOP

原来跟这句话本身都没什么关系的,我一直在想怎么忽然扯到波长上来了。。

TOP

怎么会是E呢。IF 只能引导如果从句,明显这里是引导是否得说

TOP

那(E)呢? Some galaxies do not rotate or rotate too slowly for their rotational velocity to be measured
这项为什么不能削弱啊?假如那个旋转速度都测不到了,那怎么进行分析呢?OG解释说文章已经默认了这个旋转速度是可以预测的,可是我怎么知道哪些是默认的哪些是不默认的呢?~?~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看