求解GWD的一道逻辑题

ashleych

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashew were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government‘s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.    Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing plants and plastics
B.    Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants
C.    More people in kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them
D.    Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices
E.    A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the cities

答案是E. 整个题的逻辑线都不太清楚...前面不是说税高会怎样怎样的..最后怎么来个however，税没了会怎样...

觉得A-E都没什么关系啊...求解释....谢谢大家

ashleych

脑子抽筋了...终于明白了...
是他因同果的削弱。。。谢谢你了，非常感谢~~

tinyhuhus

结论就是最后一句话：降低税的话不利于降低城市失业率。E大量农民不挣钱只有到城市找工作，他们是没工作的啊，城市的失业率因他们上升了

ashleych

谢谢你帮忙解决逻辑题啊....但是我还是不太明白....能不能再打扰你细解下：
文章的conclusion是什么呀？ 是”降税导致失业率上升”么？
那E选项，没有职业的农民工，怎么削弱这conclusion..... 是说，没职业农民工，所以也就没失业率这一说么？

tinyhuhus

政府不愿意降低税是为了让nuts 在国内城市加工，提供就业机会降低失业率，E说不挣钱的务农使农民都涌入城市，也就是没有职业的农民工，与降低失业率的原衷相悖。题目中有说如果降低税，出口多，农民收入多。