Driving the steep road to the mountaintop Inca ruins of Machu Picchu
is potentially dangerous and hiking there is difficult. Now the Peruvian government is installing a cable car that will make access much easier, and hence results in a large increase in tourisms. However, since the presence of large numbers of tourists tends to accelerate the deterioration of a site, installation of a cable car is certain to result in harm to the ruins.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the argument?
A.The daily number of tourists that are expected to take the cable car to Machu Picchu
is smaller than the
original resident (原来的旅客)
B.The construction of the cable car terminal at Machu Picchu
will require the use of potentially damaging heavy machinery at the site.
C.Machu Picchu
is already one of the most popular tourist sites in Peru
D.Natural weathering will continue to be a more significant cause of the deterioration of Machu Picchu
than tourist traffic
E.The cable car will replace the tour buses whose large wheels and corrosive exhaust at present do significant damage to the site.
这个是争议题 贴出来时想想说说自己的看法~~很多人是在C 和E 之间的讨论
我自己的观点是选A
很多人说这个A无关， 但是我个人认为出题着的思路：1 有了这个cable car 之后，人们很容易去M这个定点，但是由于去的人多，M这个景点就会污染更快，原因是更多的人去这个景点了。那么选项很多情况下和这个人数是有关系的（我做CR题很多时候看选项的时候只看主语，然后就可以剔除了）。
在5个选项中只有A相关，然后A的解释我认为是这样的：如果大家都徒步或者自己开车的话，一天中有100个人要去，但是有了这个cable car之后，人们很容易座这个CAR就去了，但是这个CAR一天只能载50个人（即使有这个cable car之后每天有200个人来）。
这里有个后门就是剩下150个人会怎么样的：1 继续自己开车或者步行（这样的话200的数目要随之减少），2不去M景点了
这是我对这个这个题的看法，有NN出来指正一下的吗?
| 
