返回列表 发帖

GWD-6-40

Q40:

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

为什么D正确,我理解不来,请大家帮忙了....谢谢!

收藏 分享

D是正确的!

如果地球上所有的细菌全部来自火星,当然不可能辛街植煌慕峁梗琁F这个成立,那么文章的结论说来自火星的灭绝了就错了!因为现有的细菌来自火星,但却没有灭!

TOP

我不是很明白这题原文说什么?请那位可以帮助翻译一下

TOP

試著簡單解釋成這樣:

有理論認為細菌是發源於火星並藉由隕石被帶到地球上. 但是, 不同星球上的細菌其蛋白質應該要有結構上的不同, 且這種不同是不會隨時間發展而消失的 (persist over time...), 而目前地球上的細菌種類都不具有足夠的不同點證明他們來自不同星球. 因此, 即便地球上確實有細菌來自火星, 這些細菌也已經不存在了...

答案D, 見2樓的解釋, 很清楚... 我本來也選錯了的...

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看