返回列表 发帖

大全-D-14

14. A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.
答案D, 觉得有疑问. 因为原文在描述这个调查结果的时候是将"massive doses"三个结果之前,也就是说可以从整体上把三种结果都称为massie doses的结果,(因为后面的句式是:  of..., of... and of...) 可是, 原文并不能像D中所说的可以prevent, 有一些就没有prevent, 这个结论是不是不太全面. 我选C, 可是C怎么错了呢? 明白的人帮忙看看.
收藏 分享

d肯定正确的了
如果我们研究一个课题
吃一锅饭对人的影响
其中一组人吃一锅饭,第二组吃一碗饭,第三组吃一勺子饭
这样才能作出对比嘛
这个和原文的逻辑很好的吻合了

我觉得c还少了一个条件,那就是要吃一年以上才会有这个效果出来,光多吃没有用的

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看