返回列表 发帖

GWD-1-19

Q19:

Sunflowers growing in pots were placed, with their roots submerged, in the pond contaminated with radioactive elements. The sunflowers kept growing; in the process, they absorbed radioactive elements. Within twelve days, 85 percent of the radioactive elements were removed from the water, which is no less than can be accomplished with the much more expensive conventional filtration techniques. Scientists therefore propose using sunflowers for decontamination wherever there are radioactively contaminated ponds.

Which of the following, if true, points to a limitation on the applicability of the proposed method of decontamination?

Some plants other than sunflowers can also remove radioactive elements from water. The water in many ponds contaminated with radioactive elements is so cold that it would kill sunflowers whose roots were submerged in it. Sunflowers that grow with their roots submerged in water grow less well than sunflowers growing under optimal conditions on dry land. Only species of sunflowers with large leaves can have their roots submerged in water and still keep growing. In ponds in which the circulation of the water is artificially increased, sunflowers absorb radioactive elements far faster than they do in other ponds.

Answer:

这道题问计划的局限性。答案好像是C。我选的是B. 提干中并没有标明sunflower 长得不好就不能decontamination. 可是B选项又对题干的前提进行了否定,好像也不对。 难搞

请NN指点

收藏 分享

首先申明我不是NN。C个人认为比B好,推翻前提的weaken是明显的干扰选项啊,weaken的对象应该是结论啊。
把所有的困苦都看做是有意义的,是生命对你的磨练,也许,是为了让你成大事而做准备。

TOP

有道理。还是NN啊

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看