返回列表 发帖

大全-II-14

14. Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on the export of a strategic metal to country Zenda, if imposed, would drive up the price of the metal in Zenda at least tenfold. They note that few other countries export the metal and that, with an embargo, Zenda might have to depend on as-yet-unexploited domestic sources of the metal.

Which of the following, if true, constitutes the most serious objection to the analysis above?

(A) Litora’s economy depends heavily on foreign currency earned by the export of the strategic metal to other countries.

(B) There are foreign-policy steps that Zenda could take to appease Litora and avoid being subjected to an embargo on the metal.

(C) Geologists believe that additional deposits of the metal could possibly be found within the LACE>LACETYPE>territoryLACETYPE> of LACENAME>LitoraLACENAME>LACE>.

(D) Only a small proportion of Zenda’s import expenditures is devoted to the import of the metal from Litora.E

(E) In case of an embargo, Zenda could buy the metal indirectly from Litora on the world market at a less than one-third increase in cost.

What's difference between (B) and (E)?

Thanks for your reply!!!!

收藏 分享

题干问的是OBJECTION THE ANALYSIS ABOVE.

原文分析的结果包括:1, Z国金属价钱至少上涨10%;2,Z国只能依靠自己国家

资源;等。

B没有反对上文中任何一个。

E加强了1,反对了2,所以还是反对原文。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看