返回列表 发帖

gwd1-1

1。During her presidency of the short-lived Woman’s State Temperance Society (1852-1853), Elizabeth Cady Stanton, as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be made sufficient cause for divorce.

as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be as she was a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by her suggestion of drunkenness being in being a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, had scandalized many of her most ardent supporters with the suggestion of drunkenness being a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, she scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in suggesting that drunkenness should be

the answer is d, that is ok, no problem

这里想到一个问题,

a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be

这里可不可以改成 as a staunch advocate呢,也就是说变成Elizabeth Cady Stanton as a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws 这样改可不可以呢,和答案中的形式有何区别呢?请指教

收藏 分享

语法上是没有错的,都成立。

不过逻辑上有问题,两者的区别是限定性修饰和非限定性修饰,请参考OG141关于两者在逻辑意义上的区别。

TOP

能解释的详细一点吗?偶笨!~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看