OG12 CR65 题；搞不明白，请大牛指点！！

qianyangnet

65. Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of Cyprus revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed
buildings typical of towns devastated by earthquakes. Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction
was due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the archaeologists’ hypothesis?
(A) Bronze ceremonial drinking vessels that are often found in graves dating from years preceding and
following A.D. 365 were also found in several graves near Kourion.
(B) No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in Kourion, but coins minted before that year were found in
abundance.
(C) Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
(D) Several small statues carved in styles current in Cyprus in the century between A.D. 300 and A.D. 400
were found in Kourion.
(E) Stone inscriptions in a form of the Greek alphabet that was definitely used in Cyprus after A.D. 365 were
found in Kourion.

我选的是C，答案是B
我的想法，C中说大多数历史都提到了公元前365左右发生了地震，不是支撑了吗？ 反而B选项，题干中根本没说硬币的事儿啊，我觉得无关
请牛牛指点！

qianyangnet

多谢 各位牛牛，指点：）

chensong211

最主要是找到 前提 和 结论 ，用结论来判断argument的重心

另外，不是所有类型的题都可以用 无关词 来判断无关的。
判断相关最靠谱的方法还是根据结论来，和结论无关才无关。

summerwaker

没有说一下就能很快的抓住重心，入门的时候我也错得不少，做了1个月还是没什么头绪，后来就停下来，仔细研究了一下BIBLE，再刷了2,3遍OG就思路非常清晰，只有不停的重复做每类题型，清楚它们的逻辑链才能排除无关信息，这种能力不是一下就能练成的，要通过大量的训练和事件的，还有就是平时做CR的时候不要单单分析正确选项，错误和迷惑选项有时也能给你很大的觉悟

qianyangnet

我基础太差，看题比较慢，必须打开词霸抓词才能看懂，题目，呵呵

我觉得还有一个因素，就是，我即使看懂了题目

也没搞清楚，题目信息的，重点，即语义重心

就像这题，我老关注在earthquke上，没感觉时间

这个您是怎么发现的，

您平时是，怎么看CR，很快就能抓住题目的重心的

麻烦，请教

qianyangnet

哦，知道了，多谢大牛指点
看了60十多道题目了，
还是没找到自己的方法，应该算没感觉
继续看

summerwaker

OG是一本狠好的CR训练材料，对上面的题反复推敲CR能力一定有质的飞跃

qianyangnet

Focus on the time AD 365

Think you！

summerwaker

The explanation given by OG is good but a little ambiguous. The fact thatbuilding and other stuff are devastated in not in dispute. Just diagram the stimulus.


Premise：Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island of Cyprus revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed buildings typical of townsdevastated by earthquakes.


Conclusion：Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction
was due to a major earthquake known to haveoccurred near the island in A.D. 365.


How can you just refer to the information about earthquake and then conclude that the building were devastated by an earthquake in AD365？？？？（focus on this time！）



C choice：AD 365 did experience an earthquake.But when you add this information into the argument，can the conclusion be drawn？（Why can the building be devastatedby other earthquake in other period？）



It is the time that matters theargument but not the occurrence of earthquake. Foucs on the gap on the argument。