新prep cr 92题。。。真心求教啊！！！！

lovedoublej

92.   
Editor:  Articles in Gardening Magazine often spur sales of the plants they describe, particularly among people new to gardening.  Accordingly, we will no longer publish articles or accept advertisements praising the beauty of rare wildflowers.  Most such plants sold to gardeners have been difficult to propagate under cultivation, so plant sellers often collect them in the wild.  Our new policy is part of our efforts to halt this yearly plundering of our native plant populations.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the wisdom of the magazine's new policy as a way of pursuing the intended effect?
A. When people new to gardening buy plants, they often fail to take adequate care of the plants that they buy and become discouraged from buying those varieties again.
B. Plant sellers who sell rare wildflowers have no reasonably inexpensive alternative way to offer their wares directly to new gardeners.
C. The demand for rare wildflowers rarely exceeds the number of such plants that can be collected in the wild by plant sellers.
D. The propagation of rare wildflowers often depends on the plants' interaction with other organisms in their environment, such as plants that create suitable soil conditions or insects and birds that disperse seeds.
E. Revenues from sales of plants collected in the wild are supporting the discovery of new low-cost techniques enabling rare wildflowers to be readily propagated in nurseries.

各种不理解。。。求大牛们详细分析！！感激不尽~！！！！

WALLMAGE

选E吧？ E说明继续这个policy会产生更多的revenue,从而是日后的

rare flower得以在室内量产，不用开采野外的了。

lovedoublej

觉得E有点牵强啊。。。我一开始选的B。。。

avenue5th

B 是说买花的人没有（比直接在野外）更加便宜的替代品，可以卖给卖花的人。所以会继续野外采摘，从而减少国家的植被数量。是strengthen。

E是说虽然开始会减少野生花卉的数量，但是得到的利润可以用来研究，从而在温室内低成本的种植野花，最终达到增加植被的目的。

lovedoublej

谢谢楼上的!!

AARONKWOK

尝试翻译一下
G杂志上的文章常常会刺激那些所描绘的花卉的销售，尤其对于那些刚刚入坑的新人菜鸟。现在，我们将不再刊登这样的夸赞那些野生花卉漂亮的文章或广告。大多数这样的野生花卉很难进行人工培养，所以只能依靠野外养殖。我们的这样政策其实是一部分的努力来阻止掠夺我们本地花数量。
问：下面哪个选项削弱了为了达到所想要目的而执行的计划可行度
1：当入坑的新人，常常会因为没有足够的照顾好花，而产生不再勇敢，或者失去信心再次买花来养
2：卖野花的人没有其他比较不贵的途径来直接出价给客人（那么只能在杂志上节间出价给客人，也就是杂志上写出价野花的文章，这个文章并没有表扬野花的漂亮，所以不再被“和谐'的范围内，但是人们还是会在杂志上看到那些野花，然后被吸引，接着野花销量上升，最终本地花仍然不会被人们重视，导致数量被掠夺）这里要注意，文中只说了，拒绝那些”表扬花漂亮的文章或者广告“，然后又提到，只要花出现在杂志的文章上，销量会上社，两个文章是包含和包含于的关系，那么其他不表扬花漂亮的文章会继续吸引客人
3：野花的需求很少超过需求关于那些花，他们能被商人在野外种植
4：野花的生长依靠。。。。。。
5：野花的利润正在支持低成本人工培育的研究发现。这个和文中new policy停止刊登表扬花漂亮的文章没有关系，因为这个原因导致的结果其实不能支持文章的policy是正作用还是副作用。

taotao35

看清楚问啥，是new policy ,其实就是削弱”we will no longer publish articles or accept advertisements praising the beauty of rare wildflowers------------to halt this yearly plundering of our native plant populations“，那么我可以写不是表扬的文章，一样吸引客人，按照文章的意思”Articles in Gardening Magazine often spur sales “那么我就写一篇骂街的文章，照样满堂彩。 我觉得看懂文章最关键，方法啥额不保险，因为看不懂，硬套，死掉了。