返回列表 发帖

求教一个逻辑问题 急!!

In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline. During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings. The conclusion is clear: far from stultifying the intellectual capacities of students, exposure to computers can actually enhance them.

The most serious weakness of the argument above is its failure to

(A) discuss the underlying causes of the twenty-year decline in students’ test scores

(B) cite specific figures documenting the increases in test scores

(C) distinguish among the various types of computer being used by high school students

(D) define the intellectual capacities tested by the standardized math and English tests referred to

(E) explain exactly how high school students’ abilities on math and English tests could have been enhanced by exposure to computers

答案是E是有道理的,可是D错在哪里呢? 我觉得数学和英语的标准测试并不一定代表智力测试啊,两个概念不同的有必要解释说明的

收藏 分享

D will help us understand the exams but not its relationship to the increased exposure to computers, therefore irrelavant to the argument which directly links the students' performance on the tests with the students' experience in using computers.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看