返回列表 发帖

[求助]LSAT-4-1-25

LSAT-4-1-25. Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.

(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.

(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.

(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.(E)

(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

为什么不能选B? b是不是e的逆否命题阿?

收藏 分享

If the increase<10%, then go bankrupt.

If 10% is possible, then 20% is also possible.(10%->20%)<=>(20%~->10%~)

E: 20%~->(10%~)->bankrupt.括号里的10%是我们从提干中推出来的。

TOP

xie   xie  !!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看