返回列表 发帖

CR大全-19-6

6. Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?

(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.

(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.无关比较点

(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their inability to regenerate themselves naturally.无关比较点

(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.A)无关

(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies.可以解决的

论据:抑制物抑制神经再生, 结论:发现抗体,可实现神经再生,问削弱

一直没想明白A为何是削弱 是如何削弱的呢

谢谢

收藏 分享

我看了一下NN们的解释,明白了.inhibitors的主要功能是别的话,比如对脑子有好处,开发智力.那么deactivate了,那就影响了智力开发,虽然神经修复了但产生的别的坏的结果了,那么还是不能变成基本的医疗过程,附作用太大了.
把所有的困苦都看做是有意义的,是生命对你的磨练,也许,是为了让你成大事而做准备。

TOP

Discussed before.

Let me give you an example: eating make people sick. Therefore, people

should stop eating to prevent sickness. Weaken: eating is critical for

people to sustain, or, making people sick is just a by-product of

eating.

TOP

虽然差不多明白了题目的意思,不过又觉得这道题的结论不好,结论是nerve

repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future,

似乎改成adding such antibodies to human body will be a standard medical

procedure in the foreseeable future更好,不知道大家的看法怎样???

TOP

many   thanks !![em08]

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看