返回列表 发帖

陈向东的一题

No ambitious politicain will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable. Nonetheless, elected public officials who do not appear vulnerable as they attempt to win reelection rarely run unopposed.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from them?

A. If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challenger will all be ambitious politicians.

B, Some elected official running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians.

C. Elected officials running for reelection who do not appear vulnerable are themselves ambitious politicians.

D.A person who is not an ambitious politician cannot win an election conteted by the current officeholder.

E. A politician's career will be serously set back if the politician wages an unsuccessful campaign for elctive office.

Answer: B. 我选了C. 不明白这道题的推理, 谁能讲讲吗?

收藏 分享

意思应该是说 ambitious的政治家是不会去跟争取连任的elected public official竞争的 除非后者vulnerable. 但是并非vulnerable的elected public official都会在争取连任的过程中遭遇竞争者 因此这些(我的理解是)有点不自量力的竞争者都不是ambitious的政治家

TOP

agree!!!!!!!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看