B - "substantial cost" does not mean anything, it has to compare to the potential financial gain or loss as a result of swtiching from pepper to cocao; if the switching cost is still higher than the positive gain from producing cocao, it is no BETTER OFF; if the switch cost is still less than the positive gain from producing cocao, it is BETTER OFF. D - same principal, if weather is bad, it favors neither pepper no cocao, like you said, both will yeild a lower production, but no comparison between them two, pepper could be either BETTER OFF or NOT, depends on who is affected more severely. C - If those growers had not switched, supplies of peppers would have been higher, price would have been stable (but not increase), so the growers would not have been BETTER OFF, for sure.
|