返回列表 发帖

GWD3-Q24:






Why firms adhere to or deviate from their strategic plans is poorly understood.
However, theory and limited research suggest that the process through which such plans emerge may play a part.
In particular, top management decision-sharing—consensus-oriented, team-based decision-making—may increase the (10) likelihood that firms will adhere to their plans, because those involved in the decision-making may be more committed to the chosen course of action, thereby increasing the likelihood that (15) organizations will subsequently adhere to their plans.


However, the relationship between top management decision-sharing and adherence to plans may be affected by a firm’s strategic mission (its fundamental approach to increasing sales revenue and market share, and generating cash flow and short-term profits).
At one end of the strategic mission continuum, “build” strategies are pursued when a firm desires to increase its market share and is willing to sacrifice short-term profits to do so. At the other end, “harvest” strategies are used when a firm is willing to sacrifice marked share for short-term profitability and cash-flow maximization.
Research and theory suggest that top management decision-sharing may have a more positive relationship with adherence to plans among firms with harvest strategies than among firms with build strategies.
In a study of strategic practices in several large firms, managers in harvest strategy scenarios were more able to adhere to their business plans.
As one of the managers in the study explained it, this is partly because “Typically all a manager has to do [when implementing a harvest strategy] is that which was done last year.”
Additionally, managers under harvest strategies may have fewer strategic options than do those under build strategies; it may therefore be easier to reach agreement on a particular course of action through decision-sharing, which will in turn tend to promote adherence to plans.
Conversely, in a “build” strategy scenario, individual leadership, rather than decision-sharing, may promote adherence to plans. Build strategies—which typically require leaders with strong personal visions for a firm’s future, rather than the negotiated compromise of the team-based decision—may be most closely adhered to when implemented in the context of a clear strategic vision of an individual leader, rather than through the practice of decision-sharing.


  

GWD3-Q24:

The passage cites all of the following as differences between firms using build strategies and firms using harvest strategies EXCEPT

A.
their willingness to sacrifice short-term profits in order to build market share

B.
their willingness to sacrifice building market share in
            order to increase short-term profitability

C.
the number of strategic options available to their managers

D.
the relative importance they assign to maximizing cash-flow

E.
how likely they are to employ decision-sharing in
            developing strategic plans


------------------------------------------------------------
正解是E我选B 我 没找到building maret share, 但是有decision-sharing
收藏 分享

文中有提到harvest strategy是sacrifice market share来寻求short-

term profitability,这和B描述不就是一样的嘛?有没有building并没有真

正的影响句子的意思。

而E)中的问题是在讲如何develop strategic plans而文章中比较的是develop

完后以后执行阶段是否会adhere to the plan。所以没有依据说明E是成立的。

TOP

哦 有点明白了 谢谢

TOP

原文:
Research and theory suggest that top management decision-sharing may have a more positive relationship with adherence to plans among firms with harvest strategies than among firms with build strategies.
不就是E么?
为什么E没有提及?

TOP

这篇文章真难~主要是因为这是篇纯理论研究的文章!
最发怵这种抽象词汇很多的文章了。。。

TOP

因为harvest或者build两种战略都会用到decision-sharing,只是在build中,decision-sharing与是否adhere to plan较为不相关,是个人领导占主导地位。

TOP

表示LS的总结比较enlighten

TOP

这题我也错了,总结下题目问的是differences between firms using build strategies and firms using harvest strategies EXCEPT: 重点在这个differences
选项E. how likely they are to employ decision-sharing in developing strategic plans文章只提到了build strategy 更多依靠leadership,而没提到harvest strategy和developing没啥关系,所以E错。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看