返回列表 发帖

大全2-5

5. The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

the key is B,

however why not C? would some one please help me out???

Thx a lot!

收藏 分享

文中说If public transportation were handled by a private firm,

profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the

necessity for covering operating costs with government funds. 正说明

了政府可以不用再负责给公共交通运营成本买单了,因为私营会用利润来解决

。C说政府要给私营补贴,政府还是要掏钱啊。

TOP

D为什么不对呢?题目说政府不能institute cost-saving reductions in service,为什么不能推出私营可以采取这些措施呢?

TOP

many  thanks !!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看