返回列表 发帖
自然科学类
2.1.1生物进化理论
V1 by 老张1119
说某种生物的进化吧好像 我只记得大体结构了 因为我两篇超长阅读之后发现第三篇还这么长就崩溃了
第一段是说这种生物的和水有关的一种能力 好像还和水生生物比较了一下
第二段是科学家提出的一个理论
第三段是科学家详尽的解释了这种理论 第三段很长 全段高亮…还高亮了两次…== 第一次好像是问下面哪一个strength了科学家的这种解释 第二次好像是infer题 问可以从这段里面得出什么

TOP

1.2.4 P药与心脏病关系
V1 by jessicacai
第一段说,一个关于Nurse的survey发现,那些服用P药的人比不服用的人患心脏病的几率小,从而推测说P药可以decrease患心脏病几率。但又一个survey发现,服用P药的人竟然连accident的几率都比不服用的人小,于是开始质疑原先的结论,因为很显然,吃药与降低事故的几率没关系。于是就继续做实验,结果证明P药会increase患心脏病的几率。
第二段,解释。服用P药的人对于健康比较关注,所以生活习惯各个方面都会注意保健,所以患病的几率小。然后做实验(记不得了,貌似有提到placebo),最后说,两个表面上有联系的事件可能是因为其他的原因而被联系在一起(主旨)
考题:
1)以下哪种情况与“服用原本增加患病几率的p药和患病几率减少”这个paradox最为相似?(这个表达是lz的理解,不是原来的表达)答案蛮好排除的
2)主旨题
3)nurse survey说明了什么?

TOP

1.2.3 日本经济
By lesezeichen 680
一篇是讲日本经济的,或者说是讨论日本的经济模式吧。说有人认为日本的发展,哦对了,这个文章是93年的文章,所以大概是说当时日本的飞速发展印证了一个理论,这个理论是说怎么样怎么样;然后有critic说非也,日本的发展不过就是assembly line。到这里是第二段了,所以可以大概知道有两种不同的理论,一个说日本的发展是有innovation的,一个就说不过是流水线之类的,这里面有很多词哟,比如pressure之类的,反正就是描述这种发展的性质。然后第三段,作者就说,其实应该是把这两种说法结合起来,就能概括日本这种发展了。

TOP

1.2.2 预测未来

V1 by doodle

预测未来的需求却往往导致不好的结果之类的

我的材料:

Demand forecasting is the activity of estimating the quantity of a product or service that consumers will purchase. Demand forecasting involves techniques including both informal methods, such as educated guesses, and quantitative methods, such as the use of historical sales data or current data from test markets. Demand forecasting may be used in making pricing decisions, in assessing future capacity requirements, or in making decisions on whether to enter a new market. 这个只有名词解释,具体的内容大家可以自己继续搜,熟悉一些词汇吧

原文

1.
T-7-Q23-Q25
企业新产品开发对市场供求的影响

Companies that must determine well
好卖的产品产量太少,难卖的产品

in advance of the selling season how
产量又太大。

many unites of a new product to manu-
Line facture often underproduce products
(5) that sell well and have overstocks of
others. The increased incidence in

这种供求矛盾似乎很讽刺,因为

recent years of mismatches between
消费者购买模式的数据趋于精确,

production and demand seems ironic,
弹性生产又允许小量商品的生产。

since point-of-sale scanners have
(10) improved data on consumers’ buying
patterns and since flexible manufacturing
has enabled companies to
24
produce, cost-effectively, small
quantities of goods. This type of

弹性生产导致美国每年新产品

(15) manufacturing has greatly increased
大量增加。但是频繁引入新产品

the number of new products introduced
有两个消极的副作用。

annually in the United States. However,
frequent introductions of new products
have two problematic side effects. For

一方面产品平均寿命缩短;它

(20) one, they reduce the average lifetime of
们既不处于初期(难以预计),

products; more of them are neither at the
也不处于末期(库存昂贵)。

beginning of their life (when prediction
is difficult) or at the end of their life
(when keeping inventory is expen-
(25) sive because the products will soon
become obsolete). For another, as

另一方面,随着新产品泛滥,

new products proliferate, demand is
需求在增加的库存单位内分配

divided among a growing number of
stock-keeping units (SKU’s). Even

虽然厂商和零售商有些把握预

(30) though manufacturers and retailers can
计准确的累积总需求,但他们

forecast aggregate demand with some
难以准确预计这些需求在众多

certainty, forecasting accurately how
库存单位内如何分配。

that demand will be distributed among
the many SKU’s they sell is difficult.
(35) For example, a company may be able

例如,一家公司可能可以准确

to estimate accurately the aggregate
估计鞋子总售量,但它不确定

number of shoes it will sell, but it may
哪种鞋子会卖更多,哪种鞋子

be uncertain about which specific
会卖更少。

types of shoes will sell more than
other types.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q23:
Which of the following most accurately describes the function of the last sentence in the
passage (lines 35-40)?
A. To cite a situation in which the aggregate demand is more important than the
distribution of demand among SKU’s
B. To refute an assertion about the side effects of flexible manufacturing
C. To illustrate an assertion about companies’ ability to forecast demand
D. To provide an example of ways in which companies address the difficulties of
forecasting demand
E. To note an exception to the author’s assertion about distributing demand am-ong
SKU’s

Q24:
The passage suggests which of the following about divided demand among a growing
number of SKU’s?
A. It has increased the average lifetime of products.
B. It has resulted from retailer’s attempts to predict demand more accurately and
avoid both understocks and overstocks.
C. It has decreased the use of flexible manufacturing by companies.
D. It has not increased the expense of keeping inventory of certain products.
E. It has not prevented companies from predicting aggregate demand with some
certainty.

Q25:

According to the passage, which of the following has led to growth in the number of new products introduced in the United States each year?

  • Reduced average lifetime of products
  • Increased ability to forecast aggregate demand
  • More cost-effective ways of keeping inventory for products
  • Cost-effective production of small quantities of goods
  • Increased ability to divide demand among a number of SKU’s and to forecast how that demand will be distributed among those SKU’s

TOP

1.2.1 boater
V1 by doodle
一道是有关于boater的,说是有一个景点1985年的人比1975年的人多了很多,但是调查下来却发现旅游者并没有觉得很拥挤,然后举例分析了原因说是因为旅游者们的preference什么的有改变
材料:感谢fargone大人!完美匹配考古
Crowding and carrying capacity research has been dominated by cross-sectional studies. Researchers have modeled the impact of visitor use on the quality of the outdoor recreation experience by measuring social conditions (use levels and encounters with others), psychological conditions (evaluation of encounters and perceived crowding), and social psychological conditions (encounter expectations and preferences). From these measures, one can aggregate visitor responses into a normative standard for "appropriate" use levels that can help resource managers set visitor use policy.
      
      his study incorporates time into an analysis of crowding and carrying capacity to investigate how change affects visitor evaluations and experiences. The analysis employed three cross-sectional surveys of boaters to the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in Wisconsin匹配考古 over a 22-year period, beginning in 1975 and each administered approximately 10 years apart.
       This framework assumed that perceived crowding is an expression of individual judgment and socially shared norms about "appropriate" density at a given site and at a given time.也就是说,挤不挤,感觉说了算 How crowded people feel depends, in part, on the expectations and preferences they bring to a recreation site. People may feel more crowded if they expect a low number of encounters but see more people than they expected. Moreover, based on these evaluative criteria, the individual may not feel crowded or evaluate the experience negatively until visitor encounters reach some threshold number.

      This normative approach, however, is problematic in cross-sectional crowding frameworks because visitors may change over time. Time related issues of change were recognized in the early 1970s during the planning stages of early carrying capacity studies (Shelby & Heberlein, 1986). At the Grand Canyon, there were concerns that the study of current visitors could not truly assess carrying capacity because past visitors, who might be more sensitive, would have been displaced. It is possible that they could have left the Canyon because use levels had increased from 500 visitors a year in the mid 1960s to over 16,000 in 1972. The "last settler syndrome" (Nielson & Endo, 1977) or "uninitiated newcomer" phenomenon (West, 1981) suggests that some newcomers to an area may have weakly defined normative expectations and preferences about an area (Roggenbuck, Williams, Bange, & Dean, 1991) and therefore will define current conditions as normal. Thus, aggregate measures of norms may change because of shifts in visitor composition over time.
Norms may also change independently of visitor composition. Cole and Stewert (2002) used a diary sampling method among Grand Canyon backpackers, and found substantial variation in individual responses to normative evaluations when measured at different backcountry zones and at different times during their trip. The product shift phenomenon suggests that people can also change their minds about standards of appropriate use given changing personal and social contexts (Shelby et al, 1988; Shindler & Shelby, 1995). The norms that they hold may change over time, and hence a relationship between encounters and perceived crowding that holds at one point in time may not hold at a second point. So, collective evaluations may also change, even while visitor characteristics remain roughly the same over time. Even though use level may be increasing, aggregate crowding levels may shift depending on a variety of broad social factors that may change the way people define appropriate uses of a recreation site. The only way to observe the potential for change, either in visitor composition or in the normative standards of visitors, is to measure social conditions and visitor evaluations at a single site over time.

TOP

1.1.9 女性受男性影响
V1 by jaejonng 710
有一篇是也很长,关于女性是否受男性影响的新老观点对比。
首段介绍老观点,受影响。然后介绍新观点不受影响。
观点绕的挺多。大家注意它举的例子。我考的题目几乎全是例子的细节题。

TOP

1.1.8 外包服务
V1 by jsf22
第一段说1980年之后,美国公司大量裁人,但单位生产率并未提升,产出并没有下降;分析了不是高科技运用提高了生产率,另有原因。
第二段说原因是大量业务外包,因为公司追求更少的人工成本,因为除了不用支付更多的工资,也不用支付那么多福利。同时公司做法并不违反劳工合同,因为skilled employee公司会继续留用。
有主旨题。还有问为什么要外包,选降低人工成本。还有问为什么说不违反劳工合同。不太确定记忆是否准确了。
我的材料:
背景:经济滞涨时期,企业采取外包,节约成本。但是,带来问题,但是不违反劳动合同。  
    Outsourcing is when one company sells a part of their company to another. This usually happens when the company wants to save money. 省钱Outsourcing was first mainly seen in the early 1980’s during a time of stagflation滞涨, or a time where economic growth is slow, unemployment rates and inflation is high.  Foreign competition in trade had steady rates compared to the United States market and had a cost advantage over American goods. Car companies, which were suffering greatly during this time, took a radical step and moved about ten factories out of Michigan to Mexico (2,5).

        This outraged the United Autoworkers Union (UAW) because American’s who worked in the factories that had been outsourced, were left jobless.  UAW negotiated with the car companies to keep the outsourcing of the parts division to overseas countries (2).
        The car factories use of outsourcing caught the eyes of other businesses: companies saw profit with the use of outsourcing. Soon after more and more companies began expand their companies in Mexico, on the Mexico-United states border.  Many American citizens failed to notice the outsourcing that was beginning to happen on the United States-Canadian border.  Outsourcing of filmmaking was a common in the 1990’s, but also to the manufacturing of parts.  Canada’s trade with the United States began to increase and benefit, while American parts suppliers began to go bankrupt and lay off their workers (2).
This trend in outsourcing in the United States has been increasing steadily since its debut in the 1980’s, but now is being exposed to the average American.   Common jobs, such as calculating worker’s payrolls, can be found in overseas companies, that provide cheaper labor, then it would cost if an American laborer worked for the company in the United States (1).  Competition between companies is increasing, and companies that outsource have a great advantage over companies who only work within the United States territory.  The cutting of jobs in American businesses is becoming increasingly common, leaving healthy, skilled, and knowledgeable people to suffer as they look for the few available jobs in their area.  Companies take advantage of the cheap labor to allow their businesses to expand, which is the main reason that outsourcing continues to grow

TOP

1.1.7 书店
V1 by jsf22
第一道是说书店的。
第一段说book chain,但是放到全国,每个店仍要本地化什么的。
第二段说非连锁的书店,因为有本地化的各种优势。
V2 by jessiacacai  我觉得这个jj已经很好了,谢谢狗主人
chain store
第一段说,chain store的大量涌现使得independent store不能生存,减少了regional difference. 然而,chain store的发展是考虑regional因素的,比如geography,economy等等。举例,先是washington以及O打头的一个州,说这两个地方bookstore多是weather原因,rain多;然后说Alaska和Hawaii,地势偏远,进货难需要时间。然后又提到了Alaska和Hawaii的差别。
第二段说,independent store并没有完全消失,它们的经营策略是避免head-on冲突,到chain store少的地方经营,或者专注于special market. 书店不光卖书,还搞book signing等一系列活动。随着作者的national tour减少,这种在书店里的签名售书越来越普遍。
考题:
the passage suggests, at the time when it was written, which of the following is true?答案选项两个是关于W和O这两个州的,三个是throughout the United States. lz选的是national tour is decreasing.
我的材料:
可能和borders倒闭有关
题目:
1、主旨题
2、作者认为连锁书店XXXXX
3、地方书店的优势在于
Analysts say retail bookstore chains will cease to exist as we know them, underperforming stores will close and bookstore chains will be reduced to a few localized stores catering to specialized local needs.  
      Bookstore chains must reduce their retail footprints in order to survive, according to Wahlstorm.  He said that there is a high likelihood that Barnes & Noble like Borders will close underperforming stores in coming years.
      To stay relevant bookstore chains would have to use their store space productively and find a market niche, according to Bishop.
     “They can try to drive traffic and sales through the physical stores by means like adding cafes, establishing relationships with the local community, and offering exclusive or targeted products (B&N is making a big push toward its new educational toys & games department),” wrote Wahlstrom.针对本地市场推出营销方案
      Maybe bookstore chains have a lesson to learn from smaller independent book stores that have dodged the online and e-books bullets by keeping unique selections of books and providing social space to their local communities.地方的小书店和社区关系紧密
"Independent bookstores are very well connected to their communities. When you do that there will always be value for your bookstore,” said Lubeck. He said that bookstore chains should adopt this successful formula.

TOP

1.1.6 专利保护法
V1 by周游ing
个关于专利保护法案的,就一个F法案通过了以后怎样怎样保护专利所有人,但是说这个法案不利于法官判,后来又有个什么T法案通过了,就先缩小了到法庭打官司的范围,然后judges就很高兴。(大致意思吧,里面比较绕)

V2 by cc1990 740
最后一篇是说美国1995年和2006年的两个关于trademark还是patent的保护法。问题有主旨,还有一个是问法官为什么比较喜欢其中一个法。文中有说到其中一个法更保守,能先剔除一些case,选项里也有这个。现在能想到的就先这些啦…要能再想到再补充~
我的材料:
词汇:Trademark 、patent、 conservative

商标  
1、主旨题
2、法官为何喜欢修改过的法案,对于dilution的释义更明确
Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995
Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA)
Trademark dilution theory 商标稀释理论is one of the most contentious aspects of trademark law.Although Congress enacted the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (“FTDA”) in 1996, courts struggle to interpret the statutory language.The definition of dilution is unclear, and the appropriate standard for injunctive relief is hotly contested.激辩申请禁止侵权
      Additionally, no uniform framework for litigating dilution claims exists.The Supreme Court’s 2003 edict on trademark dilution in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. did little to quell disputes because the Court only addressed the standard of harm necessary for injunctive relief.Recently, in response  to the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FTDA in  Moseley, Congress proposed an overhaul of the trademark anti-dilution law.Presently, Congress appears close to enacting the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (“TDRA”).
    This note evaluates whether  the proposed TDRA provides beneficial alternatives to the  current definition of dilution, methodologies for analyzing claims, and standard of harm necessary for injunctive relief.  Part I provides an overview of trademark law and historical highlights of trademark dilution, including the emergence of blurring and tarnishment theories.  Part II  investigates the inherent weaknesses of the FTDA definition of dilution, explores courts’various methodologies for  analysis of dilution claims, and explains the interpretations of the standard of harm necessary for injunctive relief.  Part III explains the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FTDA and identifies statutory language changes made by the TDRA in the three areas of dilution law explored in Part II.  Part IV discusses the prospective impact  of the TDRA in the three areas highlighted in Part II.  Part  V concludes the TDRA effectively addresses the need for a clear definition of dilution and analytical framework, and presents a pragmatic standard for injunctive relief.
      Until 2006, the FTDA was distinguished from most state trademark dilution laws in several ways: (1) The FTDA protects only "famous" trademarks; most state statutes do not explicitly require trademarks to be "famous" to be protected against dilution. (2) The FTDA, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, protected only against "actual" dilution of a trademark, whereas most state statutes provided trademark owners with a remedy whenever they could show a "likelihood" of dilution. (3) The Supreme Court suggested (although it did not have occasion to hold) that the FTDA protected only against dilution by "blurring" and not against dilution by "tarnishment" (see below).
Amendments to the FTDA took effect on October 6, 2006. The Act still protects only famous marks. However, Congress amended the act so that it expressly provides protection against a use of a mark that is "likely" to cause dilution. The new statute thus eliminates the requirement of proving "actual dilution."新的法案不要求提供actual dilution的证据,因此变得容易

TOP

感谢fargone 提供
     我总结了一下,这个理论主要说的就是去掉行驶线、交通信号灯等交通规则的“提示物”,激发人们的自觉地自我约束行为,这样的交通管理效果更好。
Shared space is an urban design concept aimed at integrated use of public spaces.
Shared space removes the traditional segregation of motor vehicles, pedestrians and other road users. Conventional road priority management systems and devices such as kerbs, lines, signs and signals are replaced with an integrated, people-oriented understanding of public space, such that walking, cycling, shopping and driving cars become integrated activities.
History
The term 'shared space' was used by Tim Pharoah to describe informal street layouts with no traffic demarcation (see for example "Traffic Calming Guidelines" published by Devon County Council, 1991). The shared space concept has been associated strongly with the work of Hans Monderman, based on the observation that individuals' behaviour intraffic is more positively affected by the built environment of the public space than it is by conventional traffic control devices and regulations.
The goal of shared space is an improvement in road safety, encouraging negotiation of shared areas at appropriate speeds and with due consideration for the other users, using simple rules like giving way to the right. The term shared space should probably not be too closely defined, since there is wide scope for varying the design concept.
Safety, congestion, economic vitality and community severance can be effectively tackled in streets and other public spaces if they are designed and managed to allow traffic to be fully integrated with other human activity, not separated from it. A major characteristic of a street designed to this philosophy is the absence of traditional road markings, signs, traffic signals and the distinction between "road" and "pavement". User behaviour becomes influenced and controlled by natural human interactions rather than by artificial regulation.
Monderman is quoted as saying: "We're losing our capacity for socially responsible behaviour, ...The greater the number of prescriptions, the more people's sense of personal responsibility dwindles."  Another source attributes the following to Monderman: "When you don't exactly know who has right of way, you tend to seek eye contact with other road users... You automatically reduce your speed, you have contact with other people and you take greater care."
但是这个理论也有人质疑,主要两个原因:一是觉得残疾人不方便;二是很多骑车的人觉得不安全(这段太长我替大家概括一下哈)


Time, of course, is highly subjective. Traffic experts have long known thatpeople in traffic tend to feel they are making more progress at a slow, continuous clip than if, over the same distance, they wait at a long traffic light, then drive quickly to the next light. Traffic plays into what is known as “queue psychology”: We think waits are longer when we don’t know how long they will be, or when we are alone, for example. David Levinson, a researcher at the University of Minnesota, has found that drivers view waiting on the highway as less onerous than waiting for a “ramp meter” light to allow them to merge onto the highway.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看