返回列表 发帖

关于7宗罪

第三宗罪: 错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向> The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do.... 第四宗罪 all things are equal<纵向> The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that.... 上面这两个都是比较,但是横向的特点是什么?什么是纵向?怎么区分横向和纵向,谢谢大家。

收藏 分享

The first one is related with aspects. for example,

you draw an conclusion that the green apple is different from the red one based on the fact the colors are different.

The second one related to time.

You draw the conclusion that this year's profit would be high, based on the last year's prifit is high.

All are fallancies.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看