返回列表 发帖

我对OG100的看法,请指教

OG 100
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have
begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings. (A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

看了以前的讨论,似乎说的最多的就是bans that后不能用否定的问题, 我反而觉得这没啥疑问, 因为OG说的很明白:the negative cannot after bans is illogical. 对于这种英语习惯和规则,死记就是了. 但是OG关于both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations的解释是否表明bans后面不能使用同位语从句, 如果是这样,我想请教哪些类似的情况也不能用同位语,谢谢.

收藏 分享

对于法令性的修饰一般用现分结构表示一种持续性。

TOP

many thanks !!!!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看