可能和我的阅读有关,
19-20题提干是不是:
考古者寻找传说中的曾被包围而被毁坏的城市,他们在挖掘中层和底层时发现,在中层的底部发现瓷器(known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city)其被认为是来自城市已毁坏的后期(?),而底层却没有这中瓷器.
我的问题是,
1.我的提干理解是否正确;
2.此解题思路?包围和毁坏什么关系?
我有关"考古"的问题总没有思路.
谢谢.我想我的问题很多XDJM都能帮忙解释.
Questions 19-20 are based on the following
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.
19. Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.(C)
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.
20. The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?
(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.(A)
(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.
(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.
(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire. (E) Bronze axheads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation | 
