返回列表 发帖

求助gwd-28-23

: Goronian lawmaker: Goronia’s Cheese Importation
Board, the agency responsible for inspecting all wholesale shipments of cheese
entering Goronia from abroad and rejecting shipments that fail to meet
specified standards, rejects about one percent of the cheese that it inspects.
Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one
percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not,
the agency’s cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides.

Knowing the answer to which of the following would be
most useful in evaluating the lawmaker’s argument?

A: Are any of the types of cheeses that are imported
into Goronia also produced in Goronia?

B: Has the Cheese Importation Board, over the last
several years, reduced its operating costs by eliminating inefficiencies within
the agency itself?

C: Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected
by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping
substandard cheese to Goronia?

D: Are there any exporters of cheese to Goronia whose
merchandise is never rejected by the Cheese Importation Board?

E: How is the cheese rejected by the Cheese
Importation Board disposed of?

完全不知道是什么

收藏 分享

没人答只好自己顶了,原文说的是这个agency做的贡献小于maintain他们的费用。所以按c所说Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected
by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping substandard cheese to Goronia?如果成立的话,GCIB的存在是很有意义的,但是要是不成立的,GCIB就没有存在的必要了
还是阅读不过关呀:(主要是这里没读懂Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not, 头脑一晕,还以为是句子结构不完整:(

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看