返回列表 发帖

请教 GWD5-40

Q40:

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite.  However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.  So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

 

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

 

  1. It fails to establish whether bacteria actually developed on Mars.
  2. It fails to establish how likely it is that Martian bacteria were transported to Earth.
  3. It fails to consider whether there were means other than meteorites by which Martian bacteria could have been carried to Earth.
  4. It fails to consider whether all bacteria now on Earth could have arisen from transported Martian bacteria.
  5. It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.
The correct answer is D.

My question is how about E?  Both D and E seem similar: The Martian bacteria survived and the earth bacteria die out.

Thanks!
收藏 分享

It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out.

这是E的问题.

D中说,如果所有细菌都是来此火星的话.....

那么显然就不会和地球的有很大区别.正好削弱了结论,来到地球的细菌都"挂"了.~~~~

TOP

Got it.  E is irrelavant, since we're not talking about Earth bacteria here at all.

Thank you very much!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看