返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD-17-11

Q11:
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

Answer: B

我选的是C,B 选项我没有看明白,请指点!

收藏 分享

B不是加强吗? 正好相反

C: 说每年都有上升. 但那些年都在有restriction的情况下. 现在讲把restriction取消会怎样. 所以C无关.

D: geese行踪变了, Hunting就减效. 去了restriction也没用. 故答案.

TOP

我倾向于选D.我在以前的帖里也说过的.

这题有很大的争议.楼主在争议的答案里找一个看上去最合理的解释吧.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看