返回列表 发帖

GWD-24-35新疑问,谢谢

The milk of many mammals contains cannabinoids, substances that are known to stimulate certain receptors in the brain. To investigate the function of cannabinoids, researchers injected newborn mice with a chemical that is known to block cannabinoides from reaching their receptors in the brain. The injected mice showed far less interest in feeding than normal newborn mice do. Therefore, cannabinoids probably function to stimulate the appetite.

A)   Newborn mice do not normally ingest any substance other than their mothers’ milk.

B)   Cannabinoids are the only substances in mammals’ milk that stimulate the appetite.

C)   The mothers of newborn mice do not normally make any effort to encourage their babies to feed.

D)   The mild of mammals would be less nutritious if it did not contain cannabinoids.

E)    The chemical that blocks cannabinoids from stimulating their brain receptors does not independently inhibit the appetite.

E是排除了他因,可是B也排除了他因,为什么B不对呢?

收藏 分享

would you pls put the question into the argument above.

If it is assumption,B repeated the conclusion does not qualified for the assumption at all.

even though "can~" is one of the substances that has the function to stimulate the appetite,the conclusion will not be weaken since the "can ~"

is capable of sitmulating the appetite.

TOP

sure,make sense,thx!
Even if B + not,the conclusion is still supported but E is not like this.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看