返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD-23-32急!

1.        19. GWD-23-Q32

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species:  a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish.  Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created.  Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.

 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

 

  1. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.

  2. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.

  3. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.

  4. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.

  5. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.

答案是E,有人可以解释一下为何D错?E又为何对吗?

收藏 分享

D 与结论无关,本题的出题点在于 最后一句话的结论 与前提的桥梁缺失,所以假设肯

定是与其有关, 而E 选项如果取非,则明显不能退出该结论,所以为正确答案,

repertory 这里的意思为轮演, 这句话正确语序是说,Artisans who lived in

various parts of the Roman Empire were unfamiliar.with common repertory of

mosaic designs ,

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看