返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD 23-9

Q9:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

 

  1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.

  2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.

  3. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.

  4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

  5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

没有什么思路,请NN解答,多谢!

收藏 分享

我觉得选E。

因为政府损害了农民的利益,目的是保证城市人口的就业率。

但是农民会由于利益被损害而离开土地奔向城市,反而对就业率造成冲击。

TOP

 多谢指导!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看