- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 720
- 经验
- 720 点
- 威望
- 71 点
- 金钱
- 71 ¥
- 魅力
- 71
|
建议LZ下一个牛牛的阅读分析,里面会有解释的~~~~其实我觉得og应该解释的挺清楚的~~(ps:最近没有看g,所以 ...
mudiduange 发表于 2012-11-5 06:29
This question requires recognizing how a
particular part of the passage is related to the
overall reasoning in the passage. The first
paragraph introduces a methodology and
describes the methodology's appeal. The second
paragraph then raises concerns about the use of
the methodology, drawing attention to the
cultural and historical bias that may be present in
oral narratives. In line 21, the passage refers
specifically to the influence political rhetoric may
have on a woman's understanding of her
experience. In the final sentence, the passage
provides a specific hypothetical example of a
woman at the time of the Second World War to
illustrate this concern.
A The last sentence employs a hypothetical
example and does not describe a particular
event as being important to historians.
B Correct. After contendingthat political
rhetoric may influence oral narratives, the
passage uses the example of the Second
World War in the final sentence to support
this claim.
C The last sentence does not provide a
particular example of an oral narrative.
D The passage does not claim that some
women are more aware than others of the
social forces that may bear on them.
E The passage does not claim that social
conditions during the Second World War
led to acceptance of women in the
workplace.
说实话,看完OG对于C项的解释依然不明白! |
|