返回列表 发帖

求助GWD 2-32

Q32:D

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

 

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

why b, not d?

收藏 分享

正确答案是B

TOP

The secretary said 90% of the projects cancelled. 90% refers

to the number of project. it is not to compare the cost of

project.

TOP

since the objection was offered by oppsition parties, so the

best way to support the secretary's argu is find sth to approve

what these parties said are not so strong;

"B" obviously means opposition parties and President's party

actully stand on the same side--the best answer;

but the whole statement said nothing about "price/cost"

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看