返回列表 发帖

GWD 29-8

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

 

 

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.  This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.  This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

 

 

  1. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
  2. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
  3. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations 无关

  4. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth 不构成因果关系,与原文衔接不上

  5. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth与原文衔接不上

答案是A,可是我怎么看都怎么觉得A是无关选项,而且意思特别绕.请大牛指点

收藏 分享

A是他因

告诉我们其它虽然有严苛的制度,但人家通过增加教育和工作培训,人才增加了,经济就变好了。人才才是第一生产力!

TOP

但是沒有直接說人才和工作是經濟好的原因,這樣可是說是complete原文嗎,不是都要用直接的嗎

TOP

A是证明他因存在

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看