返回列表 发帖

[求助] TTGWD 9-16

Q16:

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division.  When the program began in 1994, the division’s hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer’s program has not met its goal are false.

 

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

 

  1. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.

  2. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.

  3. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

  4. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

  5. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

Answer: E

请教思路...谢谢

收藏 分享

均和总量的问题,要求总量减少,而题目中论据只是给出人均减少,所以必然做了有关工人人数的假设。稍稍想一下就好,选E

TOP

thanks !!!!![em05]

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用bluespecter1在2007-9-16 20:09:00的发言:
均和总量的问题,要求总量减少,而题目中论据只是给出人均减少,所以必然做了有关工人人数的假设。稍稍想一下就好,选E

我也选E

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看