费费逻辑31，32

babyboy

Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely are found on television talk shows, and it might be thought that this state of affairs is a product of the political agenda of the television stations themselves. In fact, television stations are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to capture the largest possible share of the television audience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appeal to large numbers of people. As a result, political opinions and analyses aired on television talk shows are typically bland and innocuous .

31. An assumption made in the explanation offered by the author of the passage is that

(A) most television viewers cannot agree on which elements of a particular opinion or analysis are most disturbing.
(B) there are television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing.
(C) each television viewer holds some opinion that is outside the political mainstream, but those opinions are not the same for everyone.
(D)there are television shows on which economic forces have an even greater impact than they do on television talk shows.
(E) the television talk shows of different stations resemble one another in most respects.


32. The explanation offered by the author of the passage makes the assumption that

(A) television station executives usually lack a political agenda of their own
(B)bland and innocuous political opinions and analyses are generally in the mainstream
(C) political analysts outside the mainstream are relatively indifferent to the effect their analyses have on television viewers
(D) most television viewers are prepared to argue against allowing the expression of political opinions and analyses with which they disagree
(E) the political opinions of television station executives are not often reflected in the television shows their stations produce


=================
答案都是B，但是
这两题的问题有什么区别啊。。。。为什么答案还不一样？？

NicoleYu

这两道题相当有代表性啊，充分体现了support类题目的要点：）

先概括说一下吧

支持类的题目其实是让我们去选择一个让原文结论成立的必要条件（注意，不是充分条件，只是众多充分条件中的一个），也就是说，如果这个条件不成立的话，结论是一定不成立的

也就是我们常说的，对这个选项取非，那么结论一定不成立

这里其实也就揭示了一件非常重要的事情，就是满足这个要求的必要条件其实可以有很多个，不过出题人在五个选项中只会出现其中一个罢了

NicoleYu

再来具体分析这道题目：

原文提出的事实：非主流政治观点很少出现在脱口秀节目中
分析原因：电视台与其他那些销售实物商品的厂商一样都是利益驱动。他们需要吸引尽可能多的观众，因此他们只播放能够吸引大量观众的节目。
所以得出结论：电视上的政治观点通常是bland和innocuous的。


在这个过程中，其实做了不止一个假设：

1：非主流政治观点（很少播放）和bland/innocuous的政治观点是对立的，也就是说bland/innocuous是主流这一类的（32题B选项）

2：bland/innocuous的节目是能吸引大量观众的，而它的对立面是观众不接受的（31题B选项）

因此这两个选项都是符合题目要求的假设选项

myice

牛