我的LSAT只有11套，是否下册？三个问题搞得我晕头！各位一定帮忙看看
1）A：According to many scientists the widespread production and use of CFC-eg,to provide coolant for air conditioners-inevitably leads to their escape in to the atmosphere where they destory the vital ozone layer. In my opinion,the continued use of CFC by humans like a harmful habit, which, if unchecked,could have disastrous effects on the user namely self-destruction. The obvious and necessary cure,therefore, is a complete ban on CFC production and use.
B:The cure you propose would kill, not save, the user.A ban on CFC production and use would cause the destruction of the air conditioning industry.
question;The source of B and A dispute is their lack of agreement on which one of the following term?
B)user E)destruction
问题：选B），但我选E，A的destruction是指环境而言，而B的destruction指经济和社会
2）This country does not need any more restrictions on pollution. In fact, we should abolish those that are currently on the books.In spite of various restrictions, pollution levels have actually increased over the past 40 years. Most importantly, dramatic statistics show that, as pollution levels have increased over this period, the general health of the population has impoved rather than deteriorated.
QUESTION:The author concludes that there should be no restrictions on pollution partly because;
D)pollution has not yet reached levels that are detrimental to the health of teh general population.
E)they are ineffictive in lowering pollution levels.
问题：选E，虽然E没错，但我当时选D，考虑到“most importantly”
3）The West does not escape the effects of its relationship with the non-western world. Even as an induvidual fails to develop fully without constant interaction with an equal, a tradition of thought loses vitality and lacks the capacity for rigorous self-criticism without the probing presence of an authentic "other". In the absence of constant and critical dialogue with other traditons.Western thought remains parochial, commonplace and narrow.
QUESTION:which one of the following techinciques of argument does different states of affairs.
A) identifying a point of similiarity between two different states of affairs.
B)reconciling two opposed sets of circumstances with each other.
C)identifying a conclusion that has no supporting argument.
问题：选A，但我没搞清这题的逻辑关系 |
