返回列表 发帖

大全561

One pervasive theory explains the introduction of breakfast cereals in the early 1900s as a result of the growing number of automobiles, which led to a decline in horse ownership and a subsequent grain glut; by persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed, market equilibrium was restored.

(A) by persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed, market equilibrium was restored

(B) persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed restored market equilibrium

(C) by persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed, it restored market equilibrium

(D) the persuasion of people to eat what had previously been horse feed restored market equilibriumB

(E) market equilibrium was restored when people were persuaded to eat former horse feed 问一个问题,不是说分号前后应是两个独立的句子吗?

b后面不是句子呀?

收藏 分享

(b)是句子。persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed

restored market equilibrium

restored 谓语。persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed 主语

TOP

谢谢了 主语太长, 没看出来,看来还的看看扬棚长难句!!

TOP

请问这里E和B的差别仅仅是简洁性问题吗?

我还没明白E为什么错?

TOP

former horse feed"

Dose "former" modify "horse" or "feed"?

TOP

(B) persuading people to eat what had previously been horse feed restored

market equilibrium

(E) market equilibrium was restored when people were persuaded to eat former

horse feed

我觉得这个问题在于"what had previously been horse feed" 和 "former horse feed"

是不同的。前一个由于是代词what引导,只能特指这个题目里所说的那种原来是马饲料的

食品,而后面一个是泛指以前的马饲料。所以我觉得B是对的。如果把E改为"this former

horse feed"就对了。不知道大家怎么想?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看