[求助] OG 92

feierer

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A) so many changes at once as they had in

(B) at once as many changes as

(C) at once as many changes that there were with

(D) as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E) so many changes at once that confronted them in

答案是D.

OG解释说A的错误是had的过去完成时用法不对. 可是so many ... as ... 的用法对吗?

emma-maple

为什么E选项里面说so many...that..是不对的？如果不看后面，但从这个用法来看应该是有的啊。。

迷茫了，请指点。

bluevironikas

QUOTE:

以下是引用lonelyplanet在2008-8-28 6:56:00的发言：

同问,难道是因为出现的是never,而非no,not,所以依然视为肯定句么?

只有not no的句子才是否定句，其他的什么never啊，等的，算是肯定句！！

susanyaki

同问,难道是因为出现的是never,而非no,not,所以依然视为肯定句么?

______

正解 否定的不是动词，不算否定

lonelyplanet

QUOTE:

以下是引用feierer在2008-8-25 7:18:00的发言：

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many
   

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
   

(A) so many changes at once as they had in
   

(B) at once as many changes as
   

(C) at once as many changes that there were with
   

(D) as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E) so many changes at once that confronted them in

答案是D.

OG解释说A的错误是had的过去完成时用法不对. 可是so many ... as ... 的用法对吗?

同问,难道是因为出现的是never,而非no,not,所以依然视为肯定句么?

sheeper2008

QUOTE:

以下是引用janegaojians在2008-8-25 20:05:00的发言：

so many ... as ... 的用法不对, 但ETS懒得再说了.

why the use of

so many....as...

here are wrong?

alice2292

QUOTE:

以下是引用legendends在2008-8-27 6:41:00的发言：

我同意so many as 是少用，特別是在肯定句中幾乎不用，換句話說，否定句中講so many as是可以接受的，這在OG有題目可以證明，但一時沒給翻出來。

我的看法是，這A選項錯誤，恐怕還是敗在動詞不對

Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A) so many changes at once as they had (省略了confronted) in  所以答案说它是过去完成时，时态错误

legendends

我同意so many as 是少用，特別是在肯定句中幾乎不用，換句話說，否定句中講so many as是可以接受的，這在OG有題目可以證明，但一時沒給翻出來。

我的看法是，這A選項錯誤，恐怕還是敗在動詞不對

feierer

非常感谢! ETS也太不负责了, 怎么没想到还有象我这样笨的考生呢?

janegaojians

so many ... as ... 的用法不对, 但ETS懒得再说了.