返回列表 发帖

GWD-29-16

Q16:

Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but each year since Delmont took office the average pay for the new jobs created has been higher than that year’s average pay for jobs citywide.  So it stands to reason that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?

  1. The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office.
  2. The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
  3. Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
  4. Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont’s tenure were in declining industries.
  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city

 Answer: C

请NN指点此题的逻辑过程是怎样的?

收藏 分享

was just discussed yesterday, please check for the link.

TOP

应该是相同题目问法变了吧

改成Weaken

之前讨论的是Support/Strengthens

TOP

题目:
在D市长领导下
每年新增的工作数量大于消失数量
每年新增工作薪水大于消失工作薪水
问Weken

照题目所说薪水趋势是往上的
若要Weaken
那就否定此一趋势走向
因此C选项符合
因为消失的工作薪水平均高于新增工作薪水平均
会导致全市整体薪水平均是往下的
所以可Weaken

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看