返回列表 发帖

OG 20,思路偏差,求救求救...

The number of people diagnosed as having a certain intestinal disease has dropped significantly in a rural county this year, as compared to last year. Health officials attibute this decrease entirely to improved sanitary conditions at water-treatment plants, which made for cleaner water this year and thus reduced the incidence of the disease.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the health officials’ explanation for the lower incidence of the disease?

B. Bottled spring water has not been consumed in significantly different quantities by people diagnosed as having the intestinal disease, as compared to people who did not contract the disease.

我想请教一下这个选项为什么错,因为觉得好像自己思路有点偏差

B说,染病的人和不染病的人喝水的数量几乎没差别,那是不是可以说不是因为水的问题导致的疾病下降,那样不是也同样削弱了么?

收藏 分享

B说得是瓶装矿泉水。。。

原题里说的普通饮用水。。。(water treatment plant)

TOP

晕~我明白了。。。。阴沟里帆船了。。。。谢谢

TOP

再问一句,那如果是一样的水呢?B的选项改为普通饮用水的话,是不是就削弱

了????

TOP

本人觉得是削弱了.

TOP

(A) Many new water-treatment plants have been built in the last five years in the rural county.

请问A为什么就是不对呢

明显就是削弱阿,五年来说都装了water treatment plants,证明根本不是sanitation的contribution阿

请大牛们给我一点思路,谢谢

TOP

建厂不一定等于能处理干净。

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用painstaking在2008-9-25 21:07:00的发言:
Bottled spring water 意思好像是矿泉水吧?矿泉水当然和城市的水污染没关系了。此选项应该算无关。'

agree

刚才女友发短信给我:“我们还是分手吧!”过一会,我又收到:“对不起,发错了!!”

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看