How to learn english, not really,to get high score in GMAT ?

cook

今天流浪了一下"叮当SC" , 实在佩服, .. 叫我汗言!! 众多年来,自己ENGLISH test 罕见高分.总不明WHY,今天找到些差距. 我英文实用中尚可.所学课程即便是in ENGALISH 也是　Ａ，Ａ，Ａ．．．．　，　ＢＵＴ也过不了ＧＭＡＴ７００．有点．．．．那个．　

我的大脑就是那种一做ＥＮＧＬＩSH　逐渐麻痹，　从不兴奋．其他任何课程都好．　这种＂ＥＮＧＬＩＳＨ 猪头" 可多?   想必"功夫未道" 这原因一定不充分, 对我而言.

sorry, 有感而发.

tongxun

她里面有的选项的答案是错的。这个cook兄要留意。工夫是要下的。所以，复习过程会出现一段一段不同的理解或感觉的。

cook

Ok, I will be careful . How about New oriental Book, some error answer?
I just quickly look at it- " DINGDANG" while editing a content as the following :
Content:

Chap1 Comparing Apples and Oranges
Than
AS
Like. unlike, 及比较对象一致性
Chap2. Constructing Sentence That Are Parallel
Chap3.Dependent Clause
Chap4.Apposition
Chap5 Subjunctive mood
Chap6现在分词作状语
Chap7短语
Chap8 主语一致
Chap9.其他
Chap10 时态

Can we each share "some tricky points" which are easily fool us ?  

The tricky points on which I always struggle is :
1. 现分, 过分及Clause. I know the basic priciples such as: emphasize on action  or status; 主 or 被动;经常性 OR 一次性. but sometime, still made a mistake. often, as afraid of leading to "vague" , I wasted time. ---> Any idea?

2. So... as to / so....that :  seems clearly, made 2 times mistakes.

3.About Comparison, I gave most related questions right answer but when I tied to careful read the question, I would made a mistake or when some word is not very clear under time press.

4. In New oriental's answers , the idiom is too much!!!  

How about You ?

tongxun

若单考the idiom，则该题是低分值的题目。高分值要理解。
新东方的是老的笔试题目。
其实，ETS考的就是：
主谓一致、时态、平行对称、修饰上有没有歧义。
主动优于被动：这个在合同的条文中是非常注意的。因为，被动必须有动作的执行者，若没有，就模糊。就算是有动作的执行者，与主动相比较，它也显得不简洁。

cook

yes, but why I can't fix those?  Because of timing ? maybe, not sufficient. whether study OG + New oriental SC book  is enough, including the " 知识点"? That's all I have.

tongxun

OG 是第一要素。反复体会他的解释。最后，用新东方的东西来验证。