og12-48

georgina1107

OG12 48
OG11-50
If the county continues to collect residential trash at
current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and
parkland will need to be used in order to create more
space. Charging each household a fee for each pound
of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents
to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge
will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.

Which of the following is an assumption made in
drawing the conclusion above?
(A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they
put out for collection by reducing the number
of products they buy.
(B) The collection fee will not significantly affect
the purchasing power of most residents, even if
their households do not reduce the amount of
trash they put out.
(C) The collection fee will not induce residents to
dump their trash in the parklands illegally.
(D) The beauty of county parkland is an important
issue for most of the county’s residents.
(E) Landfills outside the county’s borders could be
used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.


这题主要不太理解原文的“Charging each household a fee for each pound
of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents
to reduce the amount of trash they create”和c选项“The collection fee will not induce residents to
dump their trash in the parklands illegally.”的意思。谢谢各位，帮忙翻译一下，好吗？另外，这题是用“去非”的方法做吗？

jianglxiang

原文是说“如果把每户丢的垃圾按磅收费会让每户减少丢垃圾的数量”
c选项是说“垃圾收集费不会导致居民往公园非法倒垃圾”

不知道什么是“去非”的方法，不好评价。

shlshing

题目要求在选项中找出一个假设，从这个假设中可以推出以上的结论。个人觉得C和D都能说得通，但C是更优项，但这句话实在写得拗口得很，混淆了应该表达的意思

zm_patrickS

答案是不是B？

yaozixi

答案D是无关选项

danni423

答案b解释说 The argument would be stronger if this were assumed NOT to be true.咋个意思啊？我怎么就没觉得stronger...望高人指点！

elaineyll

个人浅见，
B答案-这个句子如果反着来说，可能加强论点。
B选项-即使那些家庭不会因垃圾排放费而减少垃圾排放量，征费这一举措将会显著地影响了这些居民的购买力。（消费减少，垃圾排放量减少，支持了论点）